Appellate Court rules transparency, Rice Notice required

The Appellate Division has ruled that the absence of discussion about a person’s employment prior to a vote does not relieve the board of its responsibility to advise the employee of his/her right to have the matter publicly discussed. The published decision states: “…[T]he fact that the board voted…without discussion in order to avoid sending…Rice Read More …

Timely response to OPRA requests is required, says GRC

OPRA custodians can “respond” within the 7-business day response period by requesting an extension of time. But repeated extensions, excessive delay, or just ignoring a request outright is in essence a denial without saying so. That delay under the guise of cooperation could result in a requestor missing the usual 45-day window in which to Read More …